• AWWA MTC64598
Provide PDF Format

Learn More

AWWA MTC64598

  • Comparison of Nanofiltration and Reverse Osmosis in Terms of Water Quality and Operational Performance for Treating Water of Impaired Quality
  • Conference Proceeding by American Water Works Association, 03/01/2007
  • Publisher: AWWA

$12.00$24.00


This paper presents a study on the development and validation of a laboratory-scalemembrane testing protocol to select viable membranes for pilot- and full-scale operation.This selection protocol balanced operational characteristics (such as pressure, flux andpotential for fouling) with product water quality and allowed for a pre-selection ofpotentially viable candidate membranes. Membranes considered for selection werecharacterized as thin-film composite (TFC) polyamide membranes and includedcommercially available ULPRO (TFC-ULP, Koch Membrane Systems; XLE,Dow/Filmtec; TMG10, Toray America; RE-BLR, Saehan) and nanofiltration (NF) membrane products(NF-90, NF-270, NF-200 and NF-4040, Dow/Filmtec; TFC-S, Koch Membrane Systems;ESNA1-LF, Hydranautics; MX07, Osmonics; NE-90, Saehan).Three candidate membranes were selected and tested using a 68 L/min (18 gpm)membrane pilot skid that was designed, constructed and operated during this study. Thethree selected candidate membranes were each tested for at least 1,300 hours onmicrofiltered feed water at two full-scale facilities. The different feed waters representednon-nitrified microfiltered effluent provided by the West Basin Water Recycling Plant(WBWRP) in El Segundo, CA and nitrified/denitrified microfiltered effluent provided bythe Scottsdale Water Campus (SWC), Arizona. Operational performance and rejection of trace organics, nutrients and total organic carbon were monitored during pilot-scale testing andcompared to the performance of full-scale trains operating on the same feedwateremploying conventional RO membranes (i.e., TFC-HR, Koch Membrane Systems andESPA2, Hydranautics). During several occasions, challenge tests were conducted at pilot-scaleto examine rejection of trace organics during periods of elevated feedconcentrations. The best performing ULPRO membrane was also selected for testing over5,000 hours in a 6.6 m<sup>3</sup>/min (2.5-mgd) full-scale reverse osmosis (RO) train to further verify findings frompilot-scale and to determine rejection behavior and operating costs under full-scaleconditions.The study was assisted through state-of-the-art membrane characterization todescribe the fouling character of NF/ULPRO membranes and its role on operation (e.g.,flux decline) and rejection. A comprehensive membrane autopsy was performed aftereach pilot-scale testing period to determine the nature of the observed flux decline andcharacterize the type and location of fouling. Includes 12 references, tables, figures.

Related Products

AWWA WQTC71421

AWWA WQTC71421

Shifting the Paradigm: The Concept of Sustainable Membrane Operation..

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA CSC94001

AWWA CSC94001

Feed Forward Chlorine Dose Control to Counteract Sudden Ammonia Increase in Water Purification Plan..

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA DSS60340

AWWA DSS60340

Practical Steps for Reducing Apparent Water Losses..

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA WQTC65770

AWWA WQTC65770

Removal of an Antimicrobial Compound by Sequential Photochemical and Biological Oxidation Processes..

$12.00 $24.00