Provide PDF Format
AWWA WQTC58827
- Critical Implementation Issues in Arsenic Sorptive Treatment: How to Prevent Good Technologies from Going Really Bad
- Conference Proceeding by American Water Works Association, 11/02/2003
- Publisher: AWWA
$12.00$24.00
Pilot testing of a granular ferric hydroxide (GFH) adsorption system was conducted usinggroundwater from Scottsdale, Arizona Well #4 to determine the ability of the media to removearsenic (As) at various pH values. The media was able to treat only 3,200 BV of water at theambient pH of 8.7 - 9.2 before effluent As concentrations exceeded the new maximumcontaminant level (MCL) of 10 Au/L. However, when the pH was decreased to pH 7.5 to 6.0, themedia treated 33,600 BV and greater than 65,000 BV before reaching the 10 Aug/L limit.Subsequent testing with GFH that had been used to treat pH-adjusted waters indicatedthat continuing treatment with this media without pH control would cause previously adsorbedAs to come off the media into the effluent at concentrations much higher than the influent. Intwo tests at pH 6.0 and pH 7.5, As was found to desorb at levels three to four fold higher than theapproximately 30 Ag/L As influent, which is also above the new MCL, and that the desorptionprocess took 7 to 18 days. In other words, should pH control in a system stop for any reason, itwould not be long before As levels in the effluent would be unacceptably high.Adjusting the pH of the water from Scottsdale Wells #23 and #32 required approximately40 mg/L of carbon dioxide gas to decrease the pH from 8.3 to 7.0 and a dose of 110 mg/L toreduce the pH down to 6.3. An air-stripping test showed that an air/water ratio of 4 was adequateto remove sufficient CO<sub>2</sub> from a supersaturated water to increase a pH 6.3 water to above 8.0.These results indicate that pH adjustment can substantially increase the adsorptioncapacity of GFH, but that the greatest capacity occurs at a pH range where the potential for leadand copper corrosion issues is very high. Any lapse in pH control can cause some of thepreviously adsorbed As to enter the effluent and potentially cause a violation of the new MCL.Finally, the tests showed that the use of carbon dioxide gas addition followed by air stripping is aviable alternative to the use of acid/base addition for pH control for adsorption systems. Includes 6 references, tables, figures.
Related Products
AWWA ACE58167
Confirming the Role of Aluminum Solids and Chlorine in Copper Pitting Corrosion..
$12.00 $24.00
