• AWWA WQTC58953
Provide PDF Format

Learn More

AWWA WQTC58953

  • Application of the Integrated Disinfection Design Framework (IDDF) for Disinfection Contactors Performance Evaluation
  • Conference Proceeding by American Water Works Association, 11/02/2003
  • Publisher: AWWA

$12.00$24.00


The disinfectant dose (CT) is a key parameter to evaluate disinfection treatment efficiency. TheCT<sub>10</sub> calculation is the simplest way to obtain a proxy to control disinfection processes. However,as the CT<sub>10</sub> value calculated for regulation purposes appears to be very conservative, othermethods were proposed to evaluate more accurately the effective microbiological dose.Currently, the Integrated Disinfection Design Framework (IDDF) is the most complete approachproposed (Bellamy et al., 1998) and is based on combining a disinfectant decay model with amodel describing the contactor's hydraulic efficiency. This approach necessitates the completionof tracer and disinfectant decay studies in order to develop these models. While such tasks arerelatively simple to conduct for chlorine or chlorine dioxide contactors, their completions aremore difficult on ozone contactors due to the increased complexity of performing hydraulictracer tests on this unit process, and the variability of ozone residual within the ozonecontactors, especially in the first cell of contactors using bubble diffusers.The main objective of this project is to apply the IDDF methodology to two full-scale ozonefacilities in the Region of Montreal (Canada) in order to compare the resulting CT values withthose obtained by calculations (CT10). The study was performed on two water treatment plants(WTP) of the Quebec province: the Chomedey WTP (180 MLD) and the DesBaillets WTP(1,500 MLD) which supplies respectively the cities of Laval and Montreal. Both WTPs utilizepost-ozonation (after filtration). Due to the highquality water at Montreal WTP (originating from the St. Lawrence river), the applied ozonedosages are lower than at Laval WTP (1.2 vs 1.7 mg/L). The Montreal WTP is also designed withshorter contact times than in Laval (4.7 vs 13.8 min), which explains the lowerapplied ozone dosages at this plant. The Laval WTP relies on an ozone injection strategy forwhich 85% of the ozone dosage is applied in the first cell, while the remaining 15% is injected inthe second cell. In Montreal, the entire dose is injected in the first cell. Includes 7 references, tables, figures.

Related Products

AWWA WQTC50390

AWWA WQTC50390

Practical Approaches to Mitigate Filter Clogging Problems in Conventional Water Treatment Plants..

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA ACE94060

AWWA ACE94060

Filtration Avoidance Under the Surface Water Treatment Rule: Defining the Issues..

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA JAW3912

AWWA JAW3912

Journal AWWA - Reservoir Coatings Can Support Bacterial Growth ..

$15.00 $30.00

AWWA MTC69680

AWWA MTC69680

Eliminating Acid from Brackish Water Reverse Osmosis Operations: A Case Study..

$12.00 $24.00