AWWA WQTC69316

The main limitation of membrane application is fouling, which causes a decrease ofmembrane performance and an increase of operating and maintenance costs. Biofouling isoften the deposit component most resistant to chemical cleanings. Consequently,membrane pretreatment has to be optimized to minimize the biofouling potential of the feedwater. This study focused onthe effect of UV irradiation on NF membrane biofouling at pilot scale in Neuillysur-Marne Water Treatment Plant (WTP), operated by Veolia Water on behalf of the Syndicat des Eaux d'Ile-de-France. At this WTP, the conventional process was composed of clarification, sand filtration,ozonation, granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption and chlorination. Two identical one-stage NF membrane pilotsand a low pressure UV reactor were implemented and operated during two different tests.During Test 1, Pilot 1 was fed sand-filtered water (SFW) and Pilot 2 sand-filtered and UV irradiatedwater (SF+UVW). During Test 2, Pilot 1 was fed GAC-filtered water (GACW) andPilot 2 GAC-filtered and UV-irradiated water (GAC+UVW). The UV dose was fixed at 400J/m² by adjusting the feed flux of the UV reactor. Both NF pilots included a pretreatment stepmade of pH neutralization, 20 and 6 µm cartridge filtration, and antiscalant injection.At the end of both tests, NF spiral-wound modules were autopsied and analyzed. The foulingdeposit was characterized by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy and by epifluorescence microscopy withdifferent stainings (DAPI for total bacteria counts, SYTO9-propidium iodide for live/deaddistinction, FTIC and TRITC-conjugated lectins for exopolysaccharides visualization). Thedeposit dry weight, wettability, ATP and proteins contents were also determined.Both membrane performances monitoring and foulant analysis indicated that UV irradiation was afavorable NF pretreatment. The longitudinal pressure drop increase was strongly limited byUV irradiation. The permeate flux decline was also slowed down by UV, at least after a 10week filtration time. The deposit is quantitatively reduced and the membrane wettability isless affected when UV pretreatment is used. All the biofilm parameters (activity, cell counts,matrix exopolymers) were also decreased. Includes 21 references, tables, figures.

Product Details

Edition:

Vol. - No.

Published:

11/01/2008

Number of Pages:

16

File Size:

1 file , 1.1 MB