• AWWA WQTC69428
Provide PDF Format

Learn More

AWWA WQTC69428

  • Powdered Activated Carbon and Natural Organic Matter Removal: What Is the Best Dosing Procedure?
  • Conference Proceeding by American Water Works Association, 11/01/2008
  • Publisher: AWWA

$12.00$24.00


Powdered activated carbon (PAC) is a well proven technology for removal of organiccompounds from drinking water including natural organic matter (NOM), taste and odorcompounds and pesticides (Karanfil et al., 1999; Treguer et al., 2006). PAC isnormally added during the rapid mix stage along with the coagulant during coagulation so thatthe PAC can be incorporated into the floc and be removed along with the sludge. However,while this dosing regime enables the PAC to be removed with the floc aggregates, there is asignificant reduction in the surface area available for adsorption when the PAC is contained inthe floc and there is direct competition between the PAC and coagulant for the NOM beingremoved.Alteration of the dosing procedure has the potential of providing a significant improvement in theoverall NOM removed and the clarified turbidity. This paper focuses on a real operational problemat a United Kingdom water treatment works (WTWs) and attempts to address the following key questions forPAC dosing:how and where should PAC be dosed for optimum NOM removal; what NOM does PAC remove over and above coagulation and is this dependent ondosing position; and,how is PAC removed during subsequent treatment?Two waters were collected and tested during these experiments. Raw water fromEwden water treatment works (WTWs) was taken (Sheffield, United Kingdom). This water is typical of a United Kingdombrown colored moorland water being of high dissolved organic carbon content and lowalkalinity and low turbidity. Water from the same WTWs was also collected after coagulationand dissolved air flotation (DAF).Three PAC were tested: two types of Chemviron Pulsorb (Pulsorb C and Pulsorb 207 CP90, andNorit SA Super). The adsorption capacity of the three PAC carbons was tested by assessingNOM removal at a range of PAC doses and at six different pH. Raw and coagulated was added to a conical flask (250 mL). PAC was dosed at various concentrations and80 mg/L at various pH levels. Adsorption was left for 6 hours, the time taken foradsorption to reach equilibrium. Each condition was carried out in triplicate.The two water types were tested on to determine the optimum removal of NOM using PAC andcoagulation using a jar tester (Phipps and Bird). The coagulant used was ferric sulphate (FerripolXL) and was dosed at a pre-determined optimum for this water at 10 mg/L at pH 4.0. PAC wasdosed at 20 mg/L. A range of coagulant PAC dosing protocols were tested. Includes 5 references, tables, figures.

Related Products

AWWA DSS65682

AWWA DSS65682

Cleveland Water and GIS - Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow..

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA ACE69107

AWWA ACE69107

Treatment Equity: Can Conventional Treatment Make the Grade When Membrane Filtration Joins the Water..

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA MTC69784

AWWA MTC69784

Recovering Membrane Plant Capacity after Four Years of Operation..

$12.00 $24.00

AWWA WQTC64093

AWWA WQTC64093

Impact of Continuous MIEX Use On Downstream Water Treatment Processes..

$12.00 $24.00